点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
【新时代新征程新伟业】赣南家具产业嬗变：从“贴牌”到“创牌”******
中新网赣州12月24日电 题：赣南家具产业嬗变：从“贴牌”到“创牌”
中新网记者 吴鹏泉
冬至时节，江西省赣州市南康区家居小镇的一家设计机构内，来自西班牙的黄龙(中文名)坐在电脑前，认真看着部分赣南家具产品的优秀设计方案，“我希望通过融合东西方设计理念，为南康出口家具进行设计，让中国实木家具进一步走进欧洲市场”。
“中国实木床，三分南康造。”位于赣南老区的南康区是中国重要的家具产业集聚区。赣南家具产业起步于20世纪90年代初，历经20多年发展，逐步形成了集加工制造、销售流通、专业配套、家具基地等为一体的全产业链集群。
图为南康区的共享智能备料中心，实现南康家具“个性化定制、规模化生产、智能化服务”的目标。(资料图) 刘占昆 摄然而，衍生于“草根经济”的赣南家具产业，也曾面临“产业大而不强、企业多而不精”的窘境，昔日南康近6000家大小作坊，更是一度被认为是低端制造的代名词。
“以前南康家具相互模仿抄袭，产品同质化竞争严重，竞争力不强，走的是薄利多销的路子，家具企业研发投入不足，多以生产制造贴牌、代加工产品为主，不敢亮身份、打品牌。”南康工业(家具)设计中心主任钟裕华对此深有体会。
60名能工巧匠在“中国实木家居之都”江西南康比拼木工技能。(资料图) 吴寒 摄 吴寒 摄为破解原创设计乏力、品牌知名度不高等制约家具产业发展的痛难点问题，江西赣州南康区依托南康家居小镇打造“设计村”，组建国家级工业设计中心——南康(工业)家具设计中心，整合原创设计资源、搭建双向交流平台、建立人才培养机制、快速转换设计成果，不断提升赣南家具品牌附加值和影响力。
“通过优先分配人才公寓住房、制定设计补贴政策、强化研发设计知识产权保护等系列举措，吸引了一大批国内外一流设计机构和人才落户南康。”钟裕华透露，目前，江西南康已吸引国内外116家设计机构600余名设计师常态入驻。
因看好赣南家具产业市场行情，深圳某设计公司总经理栗登桂选择将公司迁至南康。“根据客户需求，公司定制化设计能够批量生产的实木套系产品，通过几年资源积累，公司合作的家具企业越来越多。”在他看来，家具行业需要不断设计新款式、推出新产品，从而刺激消费者。
图为一些参观者在南康区家具时光走廊参观。(资料图) 刘力鑫 摄工业设计是工业产品的外观、功能、结构、包装和品牌的整合和创新。江西南康引导家具企业以工业设计为纽带，加快产品升级换代和品牌价值提升，推动产业链、创新链、价值链融合，提升产业发展质量水平。
统计数据显示，2021年，南康区新增原创家具产品1.2万余件，授权专利3500多件，赣南家具套系品牌企业数量由2017年的100余家增长至现在的近1000家。
为提升品牌影响力，江西南康着力打造永不落幕的“家博会”；设立“南康家具品牌联盟”，数百家家具企业主动加入；大力实施“百城千店”计划，推动当地家具进军国内中高端市场。
“南康(工业)家具设计中心建成后，很多家具企业更加意识到设计创新的重要性，也能在家门口找到一线设计服务。”在钟裕华看来，赣南家具实现了由简单模仿向原创设计、水货贴牌向南康品牌、低利润率向高附加值的深度嬗变。“我们将力争三年内实现300家研发设计机构总部落户南康家居小镇，进一步推动赣南家具企业朝品牌化、数字化方向发展”。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)